Download the complete Business administration and management topic and material (chapter 1-5) titled PRICING DETERMINANTS AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF SELECTED PAINT MANUFACTURING COMPANIES IN ABIA STATE, NIGERIA] here on PROJECTS.ng. See below for the abstract, table of contents, list of figures, list of tables, list of appendices, list of abbreviations and chapter one. Click the DOWNLOAD NOW button to get the complete project work instantly.
The Project File Details
Companies utilize various types of pricing determinants in an effort to attract and persuade customers. However the application of these pricing strategies is yet to attain maximum satisfaction for customers in many paint companies. This study, therefore examined the effect of pricing determinants on customer satisfaction of selected paint manufacturing companies in Abia State, Nigeria.
Survey research design was adopted for the study. The population of the study is 6,050 comprising the entire staff of five selected paint manufacturing companies in Abia State. Taro Yamane formula was used to derive the sample size of 488. A structured questionnaire was administered resulting in a response rate of 89.5%. A confirmatory factor analysis was done to establish validity of the questionnaire. A coefficient alpha (Cronbach’s alpha) test ranging between 0.823 to 0.933 was done to access the internal consistency reliability of the instrument. The data gathered was analyzed with the aid of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0 software involving frequency distributions and linear regression.
Findings revealed that buying behaviour has a significant effect on customer complaint (r = 0.640, R2 = 0.409, p = 0.000< 0.05); operational cost has a significant effect on customer attitude (r = 0.701, R2 = 0.491, p = 0.000< 0.05). Also, the findings show that there is a significant effect of government policy on service delivery (r = 0.753, R2 = 0.567, p = 0.000< 0.05); and competitors’ action have a significant effect on customer loyalty (r = 0.692, R2 = 0.479, p = 0.000< 0.05).
From the study, it is evident that pricing determinants variables, namely,buying behaviour, operational cost, government policy and competitors’ action, have a significant effect on customer satisfaction variables: customer complaint, customer attitude, service delivery and customer loyalty in the selected paint manufacturing companies in Abia State. Based on the findings, the study recommends that marketing management in manufacturing companies need to adopt an effective pricing determinants so as to reduce complaint from customers, enhance a positive attitude from the customers, deliver quality services to them and ensure loyalty from the customers that will indicate satisfaction from the customers.
Keywords: Pricing determinants, Buying behaviour, Operational cost, Government policy, competitors’ action, Customer satisfaction,
Word Count: 363
Title Page i
Abstract v Table of Contents vi
List of Tables x
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study 1
1.2 Statement of the Problem 3
1.3 Objective of the Study 5
1.5 Hypotheses 6
1.6 Scope of the Study 6
1.7Significance of the Study 8
1.8 Operationalization of Variables 8
1.9 Operational Definition of Terms 9
1.10 Historical Background of the Case Study 10
CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1 Conceptual Review 13
2.1.1 Overview of pricing determinants 13
184.108.40.206 Buying behaviour 15
220.127.116.11 Operational cost 17
18.104.22.168 Government policy 18
22.214.171.124 Competitors’ action 20
2.1.2 Customer satisfaction 21
126.96.36.199 Customer complaint 23
188.8.131.52 Customer attitude 24
184.108.40.206 Service delivery 26
220.127.116.11 Customer loyalty 27
2.2. Theoretical Review 29
2.2.1 Cost-based pricing Theory 29
2.2.2 Customer value-based pricing Theory 31
2.2.3 Expectation-Disconfirmation Theory 34
2.2.4 Equity Theory 35
2.2.5 Attribution theory 36
2.3 Empirical Review 36
2.3.1 Pricing determinants and customer satisfaction 37
2.3.2 Buying behavior and customer complaint 41
2.3..3 Operational cost and customer attitude 42
2.3.4 Government policy and service delivery 44
2.3.5Competitors’ action and customer loyalty 45
2.4 Summary and Gaps in Literature 47
2.5 Conceptual Model 48
CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research Design 49
3.2 Population 49
3.3 Sample size and sampling Technique 50
3.4 Method of Data Collection 53
3.5 Research Instrument 54
3.6 Pilot Study 55
3.6.1 Validity of Research Instrument 55
3.6.2 Reliability of Research Instrument 56
3.6.3 Internal Consistency Reliability Result 57
3.7 Method of Data Analysis 57
3.7.1 Research Model 59
3.7.2 Model Specification 60
3.7.3 Apriori Expectation 61
3.7.4 Model Evaluation Techniques 61
3.8 Ethical Consideration 62
CHAPTER FOUR: DATA ANALYSIS, RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
4.1Data Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation 63
4.2 Demographic Data of Respondents 64
4.3 Summary Table of Findings 68
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary 99
5.2 Conclusion 101
5.3 Recommendations 102
5.4 Contribution to Knowledge 103
5.5 Implication of Findings 104
5.6Limitation of the Study 106
5.7 Suggestion for Further Studies 106
Appendix A 125
Appendix B 132
LIST OF TABLES
3.1 Research sampling 53
3.2 Sources of adapted questionnaires 54
3.3 Confirmatory Facto analysis 56
3.4 Internal Consistency Reliability Result 57
4.1 Questionnaire response rate 64
4.2 Distribution of Respondents by Gender 64
4.3 Classification of Respondents by Age 65
4.4Distributionof Respondents by Marital Status 65
4.5 Educational Qualification of Respondents 66
4.6 Distribution of Respondent by Class of Management 67
4.7 Distribution of Respondent by Length of Service 67
4.8 Descriptive analysis of buying behaviour 69
4.9 Descriptive analysis of customer complaint 71
4.10 Linear Regression Analysis between brand behaviour and customer complaint 72
4.11 Descriptive analysis of operational cost 76
4.12 Descriptive analysis of customer attitude 78
4.13 Linear Regression Analysis between operational costand customer attitude 79
4.14 Descriptive analysis of government policy 83
4.15Descriptive analysis of service delivery 84
4.16 Linear Regression Analysis between market orientation and market share 85
4.17 Descriptive analysis of competitors’ action 90
4.18 Descriptive analysis of customer loyalty 92
4.19 Linear Regression Analysis between advertising and market share 93
4.20 Summary Table of Findings 97
In the competitive environments, investing in customer satisfaction is a means of creating a sustainable advantage, given that it serves as a link between purchase and consumption with important post purchase development, such as loyalty and word of mouth (Muogbo, 2013). Today, firms especially the paint firms have realized how important it is to understand, meet and predict customers’ needs. Customers have also become increasingly conscious of their value to these firms. Due to the highly competitive nature in the manufacturing sector, paint companies have become more interested in assessing their customers’ satisfaction, being aware that the higher the customer satisfaction, the greater the inelasticity of demand for their products. Thus, paint manufacturing companies need to determine the factors that affect customer satisfaction, in order to assess the balance between customer expectations and the paint manufacturing companies’ services offered and identify their major advantages and disadvantages (Guilaninia, 2008).
Strategic management is the process of decision making, coordinating, planning, and taking actions by the top managers of a firm in order to achieve certain goals and objectives. According to Dauda, Akingbade and Akinlabi (2010), strategy is a detailed plan for a business in achieving success and since business involves a lot of risk, an ill planned strategic move could result in loss of millions of Naira, bankruptcy of business or even loss of thousands of jobs (Dauda, et al., 2010). One of the strategies to compete effectively in the business world is the pricing determinants. Thus, this calls for strategic management in order to develop an effective pricing determinants (Dess, Lumpkin, & Eisner, 2007). This implies that top managers should allocate the necessary resources in order to bring the intended strategies to reality (Dess, et al., 2007).
Furthermore, there is a rapid change in recent business environment which has made the competition among industries to increase (Muogbo, 2013). To compete successfully, firms need to develop some strategies and take some actions which may include: enhancing product quality and productivity, reducing cost of production, promoting product innovations and improving the speed at which the product is delivered to the market and to the customers. Firms also need to strive to meet up with the changes that are occuring globally, gain competitive advantage position and improve performance relative to their competitors (Muogbo, 2013).
According to Guilaninia (2008),pricing determinants involve segments, ability to pay, consumer behaviour, market conditions, government policies, competitor actions, trade margins and input/operational costs, amongst others. Price is among the four (4) P’s of marketing namely: Product, Place, Promotion and Price, five (5) P’s of marketing which are: Product, Positioning, Place, Promotion and Price and seven (7) P’s of marketing Product, Place, Promotion, Price, People, Process and Physical Evidence (Guilaninia, 2008). Price can be seen as the amount of benefit a consumer pays for having or using the product. If the customers accept it, it is appropriate, otherwise it would be changed immediately (Guilaninia, 2008).
However, price is the most flexible elements of marketing, unlike the other characteristics of the goods that depend on the use of a distribution channel, price can be changed very easily (Guilaninia, 2008). Furthermore, price setting and competition are the problems which many executives in marketing face. Among several pricing strategies, managers can choose their favourite type. The overall aim of pricing is to enhance sales and profits worldwide (Kigan, 2001). Thus, any firm that is concerned with the production and rendering of goods and services respectively, has to initially answer the question of what to produce and for whom to produce? Secondly, firms have to answer the question of how much the actual and potential customers will be able and willing to pay for the goods. This curiosity about price fixing and other different interfering factors such as cost of producing goods, government factors, price of competitors, demand for goods, environmental/social factors and so on, concerned in fixing prices of goods and services, have proved to be a headache to many paint manufacturing firms in Nigeria (Obigbemi, 2010).
Furthermore, decision concerning price is a very important decision a firm has to make, because it will affect their objectives, directly or indirectly (Obigbemi, 2010). A business whether big or small, complex or simple, public or private, is designed to provide prices that are competitive (Ayozie, 2008). Hilton (2005) stated that setting prices for the products or services of an organisation is one of the essential decisions managers have to face as well as one of the difficult decisions because of the number of factors that have to be put into consideration. However, Lovelock and Wirtz (2004) argued that the most important tactic to a successful pricing determinants is managing firms’ revenues in a way it will support their goals. This will lead to the question of how well can the firm supplement the different factors that affect pricing decisions, in order to achieve their objective, which is to gain customer satisfaction. Therefore, the focus of this study is on pricing determinants and customer satisfaction of selected paint manufacturing companies in Abia state, Nigeria.
The relationship between a company and a customer in the past was purely based on the company producing the best quality product in order to maintain the relationship, however, therelationship between the two parties has recently taken a new turn making customers’ the main focus in maintaining relationships (Gaiardelli, Saccani & Songini, 2007).
In the face of constant technological and economic changes, today‘s consumer is more curious, more educated and conversant with what they really want. The changes have also affected the need of firms, thereby making marketing managers to face huge problems in weighing the behavioral forces and in handling the marketing mix with focus on the resources, which they have to consider when developing marketing programs to fit the needs of their firm (Muogbo, 2013). Philips (2009) noted that customers would prefer paying less, sometimes, they would rather prefer not to pay at all but it is simply not feasible to give away products without price. An organization that does that will go out of business and would not be able to create value for the customer (Philips, 2009).These constitute problems that affect the organizations’ output.Consumers worldwide have various views about products based on their prices, however, product pricing for consumers is a strenuous task. This is true due to the fact that a high price may cause a negative feeling about the product, and also a low price can be deceptive as regards the quality of the product (Philips, 2009). Decisions affecting the distribution, product and price for large markets are special as well unique to every industry, this has constituted a great challenge to managers who have not considered it to be able to have a negative influence on customer buying behavior and this has led to complaints from unsatisfied customers. Based on the above, the effect of buying behavior on customer complaints is been investigated.
Pricing has been identified as one of the difficulties a decision maker faces when trying to place a price on a product or service (Rohani & Nazim, 2012). Sije and Oloko (2013) noted that executives are complaining that pricing is a big headache and one that is getting worse day by day. Markets have largely been characterized by improper pricing, taking into consideration market demand, costs and competition. In Nigerian market, the inability of firms to freely set prices without considering the policies of their competitors concerning price, has led to a decline in profit margin made by many companies (Rohani & Nazim, 2012). If the price is too high, the firm’s product will not be competitive in the market and if it is too low, the firm may not break-even (meet operational cost). The operational cost of the paint manufacturing firms has been high and this has led to the constant increase of the prices of the firms’ products and has led to a negative customer attitude towards their product, which in other hand has also resulted to the under productivity of the firms due to low patronage. (Rohani & Nazim, 2012). Based on the above, the effect of operational cost on customer attitude is examined.
According to Egwakhide, Nyor and Terzungwe (2012), the levying of additional taxes by the government in order to subsidize the public service enterprises has had an adverse effects on the manufacturing companies. This is because manufacturing companies have to pay more in the form of additional taxes and their ability to break-even is adversely affected. When the government covers the losses of public service enterprises by giving subsidies through taxation, it cripples the productive capacity of the manufacturing companies by way of over taxation of their facilities. This will also affect the quality of services rendered to customers (Egwakhide, Nyor & Terzungwe, 2012).Based on the above, the effect of government policy on the quality of services delivery by enterprises is evaluated.
Uslay (2012) proposed that firms’ inabilities to advance and protect their strategic positions often come at great cost. Customers who are aware of the price of just one retailer are “loyal” customers, whereas customers who know the prices of many retailers are “switchers” and switchers give strength to competitors. Studies have shown that there are higher number of switchers than loyalists in the market thereby making it extremely difficult for organizations to decide on their pricing strategies. The segmentation of switchers in pricingpolicyhasled to disjoint between organizational goals and customer demands (Koca & Bohlmann, 2008). Subsequently, with the introduction of information technology which has made the world a global village, it is now easy for customers to get price information of many firms as fast as possible (Uslay, 2012). This has made competitions among firms stiffer, thereby making pricing decisions to be a herculean task for managers (Koca & Bohlmann, 2008). Based on the above, the effect of competitors’ action on customer loyalty in the paint manufacturing companies is evaluated.
However, the study identified four gaps namely: buying behaviour, operational cost, government policy and competitors’ action which have prevented the management of the selected paint manufacturing companies to attain maximum customer satisfaction.
1.3 Objective of the Study
The main objective of this study is to investigate Pricing determinants and customer satisfaction of selected paint manufacturing companies in Abia state, Nigeria. The specific objective are to:
1.4 Research Questions
The proposed study seeks to answer the following research questions:
The hypotheses for the proposed study are as follows: the hypotheses were tested 0.05 level of significant
H01: buying behaviour has no significant effect on customer complaints in paint manufacturing companies in Abia state.
H02: operational cost does not significantly affect customer attitude in paint manufacturing companies in Abia state.
H03: government policy has no significant effect on service delivery in paint manufacturing companies in Abia state.
H04: Competitors’ action have no significant effect on customer loyalty in paint manufacturing companies in Abia state.
1.6 Scope of the Study
This study investigated Pricing determinants and customer satisfaction of selected paint manufacturing companies in Abia state, Nigeria. The identified variables of pricing determinants have been examined as well as that of customer satisfaction. Abia State is made up of seventeen local (17) government areas with two major cities namely Umuahia and Aba. All the paint manufacturing companies are sited in these major cities which have five (5) local government areas in it out of the seventeen (17) local government areas. Hence, because of the wide scope of paint manufacturing companies in these two major cities, the researcher therefore limited the research to the following five (5) major paint manufacturing companies namely: Chemlap Nigeria Limited, Nicen paints limited, Saclux Industries Nigeria Limited, Clover Paints Nigeria limited and Berger Paints Nigeria Plc, which were selected from the five local governments areas that make up the cities namely: Aba south L.G.A, Aba North L.G.A, Osisioma Ngwa L.G.A, Umuahia South L.G.A and Umuahia North L.G.A.
This study evaluated pricing determinants and customer satisfaction in Abia State. Variables identified for pricing determinants have been examined alongside those identified for customer satisfaction. Manufacturing industry was selected because of their importance to the development of the nation and because there is a high level of pricing determinants employed by them to ensure customer satisfaction in their operations and in getting their products out into the market through the middle-men to the end users. Well-structured questionnaire was used to obtain data for this study. Theuse of stratification to group respondents into locations such as Aba South, Aba North, Osisioma, Umuahia South and Umuahia, was also employed. Then, the random sampling techniques was used to select the designated paint companies for each region.
The target respondent for the study consists of the total number of management personnel as well as supporting personnel working at the strategic level and operational level within the firms. The total figure for the population arrived at, based on survey of few selected firms, was six thousand and fifty (6,050) personnel. Information with regards to the population number was sourced from the Human Resource Department (HRD) of the firms. Using Taro Yamane (1967) formula for sample size determination, the study was able to arrive at a sample size of four hundred and thirty three (488) respondents including a provision for thirty percent non respondent. The stratified sampling method was used because of the stratification variables included in the scope of the study. The research is focused on paint manufacturing companies that are operating in Abia State, Nigeria.
1.7 Significance of the Study
The general understanding of this study would serve as a useful guide to management, practitioners, executives, corporate managers in the manufacturing industry. It would help them to understand how factors affecting pricing determinants such as buying behaviour, operational cost, government control/policies and competitors’ action, affect and the extent of its effect on the attainment of customer satisfaction by the companies.
The study would also enable the selected companies and the manufacturing industry to proactively respond to changes within their environment more effectively. It would l also enable the management of these companies to realize the necessity of implementing better pricing strategies in the industries. This study would enable stakeholders in the manufacturing industry to understand that employing all these resources together would enable them produce a unique capability that is rare and distinct to the company.
It would also enable the government to create better policies and regulation that would enhance development and growth in the manufacturing sector of the economy. Findings from this study would enable the society to be more informed about the pricing determinants as they relate to customer satisfaction. It would also provide more knowledge concerning pricing determinants and reveal what makes it to vary from one company to another. Lastly, it is also hoped that these findings would contribute to the body of knowledge and stimulate more researcher’s interest in this field of study.
1.8 Operationalization of Variables
The variables of this study are operationalized as follows:
Y = f(X)
Y = Dependent Variable
X = Independent Variable
Y = customer satisfaction
X = pricing determinants
Y = (y1, y2, y3, y4)
y1 = customer complaint (CC)
y2 = customer attitude (CA)
y3 = service delivery (SD)
y4= customer loyalty (CL)
X = (x1, x2, x3,x4)
x1 =buying behaviour (BB)
x2 =Operational cost (OC)
x3 =Government policy (GP)
x4=competitors’ action (CA)
The working equations are:
y1= f (x1) ………………………………. Equation 1
y2= f (x2) ………………………………. Equation 2
y3= f (x3) ………………………………. Equation 3
y3= f (x4) ………………………………. Equation 4
Y=f (x1, x2, x3, x4 + et) ………………………………. Equation 5
The variables in Equation 5 are the working Equations to be evaluated in this study.
y1 = a0 + ß1x1 + et
y2 = a0 + ß2x2 + et
y3 = a0 + ß3x3 + et
y4 = a0 + ß4x4 + et
1.9 Operational Definition of Terms
The proposed operational definitions of terms for this study are:
Pricing determinants: factors that determines the setting of prices of goods in order to attain organizational goals and objectives through prices on products and services. Almost all companies, large or small, determine the prices of their products and services on production, labour and advertising expenses but for this study buying behaviour, operational cost, government policy and competitors’ action were examined to communicate to the target market.
Customer satisfaction: a state in which a consumer of a product or service shows that his/her expectations, needs or desires have been met.
Buying behaviour: The response or reaction of a consumer towards a situation or change made by an organisation.
Operational cost: expenses incurred while carrying out production activities in the firm.
Government policy: The act of setting laws by the government to regulate or check the activities of various business organisations.
Competitors’ action: activity of organisations that produce similar products or services, which are in contest for the acquisition of highest number of customers.
Customer complaint: An act of complaining by a customer to show dissatisfaction towards a product or service rendered.
Customer attitude:The way a customer perceives and behave towards a product.
Service delivery: the act of providing a distinctive characteristics, standard and quality service to customers.
Customer loyalty: a state of being loyal or having allegiance to an organisation. In other words, it is an act of not switching from one organisation to another.
This is the brief historical development of the firms selected for the study.
1.10.1 Chemlap Nigeria Limited
Chemlap Nigeria Limited is a paint manufacturing company and other products like resin, adhesives, plastics and polymerizing vinyl chloride (pvc) gums. It was incorporated in 1983 and commenced manufacturing in 1985. Chemlap Nigeria Limited is the first pioneer company in the manufacturing of Resin in south-east Nigeria and later went into manufacturing of paints. It has depots in eight (8) states of the federation which include Lagos, Abuja, Kano, Jos, Benin, Uyo, Onitsha, Enugu, with its Headquarters at Aba, Abia state. This company from inception has distinguished itself in achieving high quality products and services which have earned it wide market recognition and patronage in Nigeria. The company is purely indigenous with staff strength of one thousand seven hundred and ninety eight (1798).
1.10.2 Saclux Industries Nigeria Limited
Saclux Industries Nigeria Limited took its feet in the early 1970’s as a trading concern with the name “Sammy Bros Nigeria” in line with his quest, passion and drive to fashion a viable business, the Chairman/CEO, single-handedly supervised and nurtured the outfit basically with the concern of dealing on paints. By 1981, Sammy Bros Nigeria won the heart of discerning end-users of paints as a major distributor to so many manufacturing companies in Nigeria. Consequently upon its position in the surface coating, the need to establish a paint company was muted. However, in 1986, production of Saclux paints commenced under the business name Saclux Industries Nigeria Limited. In the same 1986, Saclux Industries Nigeria Limited was incorporated as a Limited Liability Company with RC. NO 79691.
Saclux Industries Nigeria Limited is today a company and a major player in the Manufacturing sub – sector of the Nigeria economy, with a staff strength of nine hundred and fifty nine (959). In view of its expansion, the company in 2007 moved into its permanent industry complex located at Ohokobe – Afaraukwu Ibeku along Old Aba Road Umuahia, while at the same time retaining and maintaining its old factory at Amuzukwu – Ibeku also in Umuahia.
1.10.3 Berger Paints Nigeria Plc
Berger Paints Nigeria Plc, started operation in Nigeria on the 9 January, 1959. It has grown to be a leader in the Coating and Allied Industry in Nigeria – a legacy inherited from Lewis Berger, the German colour chemist who founded the Berger Paints’ dynasty in London, in 1760. Their other well-known brands such as Luxol (Clinstay), Super Star, Classic, etc continue to enjoy extreme popularity across Nigeria today.
Operating in 5 business segments; Decorative/Architectural finishes, Industrial coatings, Marine & Protecton coatings, Berger/KCC Heavy Duty coatings, Automotive/Vehicle refinishes, wood finishing and Preservers, with 16 depots, Colour World centres and a countrywide distribution network of dealers and Mega dealers in strategic locations spread throughout the country, the company is well placed to serve the growing requirements of the Nigeria market.
In 2012, Berger Paints Nigeria Plc entered into partnership arrangement with the biggest Heavy Duty Coating manufacturing company in South Korea, KCC Corporation to jointly serve the Nigerian Paints and Coating market. This partnership affords their customers the quality and durability that marine and protective market have found synonymous with the KCC marine and heavy duty brands. Berger Paints Nigeria Plc is located at 137 Aba/Owerri Road, Umungasi, Aba North, Abia, Nigeria.
1.10.4 Korama Clover Industries
Korama Clover Industries has a combined staff strength of seven hundred and fifty four (754). The company which is an indigenous privately owned paint and plastic manufacturing firm was incorporated in October 1983. Korama Clover Industries Limited produces high quality Clover Paints range of products for Household decorative and Hi-tech coatings, industrial and marine paints, Sinclair Automotive and protective coatings, as well as fillers, lacquers and wood finish. It has a good distribution network, with twelve (12) sales depots strategically located nationwide, which include Calabar, Port Harcourt, Owerri, Onitsha, Benin, Lagos, Kano, Kaduna.
1.10.5 Nicen Industries Limited
Nicen Industries Limited produces high quality range of emulsion paints, gloss paints, car paints and plastics products for household decorative and Hi-tech coatings. It has depots in several cities of the federation which include Lagos, Abuja, Port Harcourt, Kano, Benin, Onitsha, etc, with its Head Quarters at Aba, Abia state. It has a combined staff strength of six hundred and seventy five (675). Nicen industry limited was incorporated in 1997 and commenced manufacturing in 1998.
All project works, files and documents posted on this website, projects.ng are the property/copyright of their respective owners. They are for research reference/guidance purposes only and the works are crowd-sourced. Please don’t submit someone’s work as your own to avoid plagiarism and its consequences. Use it as a guidance purpose only and not copy the work word for word (verbatim). Projects.ng is a repository of research works just like academia.edu, researchgate.net, scribd.com, docsity.com, coursehero and many other platforms where users upload works. The paid subscription on projects.ng is a means by which the website is maintained to support Open Education. If you see your work posted here, and you want it to be removed/credited, please call us on +2348159154070 or send us a mail together with the web address link to the work, to [email protected] We will reply to and honor every request. Please notice it may take up to 24 – 48 hours to process your request.